It has taken that money and abused our systems, ripping workers off and planning to outsource workers whose jobs the airline admits are needed.”. The employee argues that the airline underpaid him by wrongly factoring in his monthly pay … FWC can rule on a JobKeeper dispute; Finally, Qantas had a loss this week (on the heels of its two wins). Qantas is in the federal court on Wednesday seeking clarification over how it has been paying workers. Qantas has lost a bid to use the jobkeeper wage subsidy to soak up a larger portion of its wages bill by topping up a worker’s pay on a monthly – rather than fortnightly – basis. Stay tuned for updates. In July 2012, Qantas sold off its Sydney-based Cairns and Riverside catering facilities, which employed 370 people, to Gate Gourmet, a company notorious for a mass sacking at its Heathrow, UK operations in 2005 during a work agreement dispute. Since the wage subsidy was introduced, Qantas had implemented the subsidy in such a way that overtime wasn’t paid until the following fortnightly pay cycle. That ‘safety net’ assurance is a central part of the government’s JobKeeper policy. The workers discarded under the company’s ground operations outsourcing plan will be required to reapply for their positions and negotiate new work agreements with whichever body-hire companies secure the contracts via a cut-throat bidding process. The Dispute. Qantas has launched Federal Court action to test whether it can use workers' earnings paid in fortnights they did not work to reduce their JobKeeper top-up payments. On Wednesday, Qantas entered the federal court to square how it has been paying workers with its responsibilities tied to its receiving of $268 million in JobKeeper subsidies. In 2018, the company offloaded its subsidiaries Snap Fresh and Q Catering, which had a 1,200 in-house workforce, to the Emirates Group’s dnata catering, cargo and ground handling entity. Mazzitelli v Qantas FWC 2685 involved a dispute about whether Qantas JobKeeper payments had complied with the Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Rules 2020 (Rules). The assault on the Qantas workforce was spearheaded by the grounding of the airline’s entire fleet in 2011, under the last Labor government, during a work contract dispute to impose an agreement slashing jobs and conditions. This application to deal with a dispute in relation to JobKeeper concerned what the applicant considered to be an incorrect application of the JobKeeper payment rules, and how they applied to monthly paid but stood down employees. Qantas told Business Insider Australia that the airline is “carefully considering” whether it will appeal the judgement, and that “it is misleading of unions to suggest employees should expect a sudden windfall”. Even before the latest restructure, Jetstar had outsourced ground crew roles at 17 terminals. Qantas loses bid to make use of jobkeeper subsidy to take in bigger portion of wages invoice | Enterprise. 30th Sep: The Full Court of the Federal Court will hear our appeal of the decision in relation to the Qantas Group sick leave case, along with the ETU, AMWU and AWU. Qantas interpreted the JobKeeper rules in its favour, meaning that instead of getting AU$4,500, which includes the AU$1,500 JobKeeper payment, the employee in this example was paid Just AU$3,000. Qantas domestic CEO Andrew David said he realised the decision to outsource ground operations “would be tough” for the affected workers, many of whom were among the 15,000 Qantas workers stood down in April without pay or on enforced leave. The Transport Workers Union (TWU) disputes that […] “These workers have endured systematic wage theft at the hands of an out of control management.”. The TWU has said Qantas’ bidding process for its ground handling contract was a sham, after it picked Swissport’s proposal ahead of its own in-house rival.. Qantas announced this month it was outsourcing over 2,000 baggage, ramp and cleaning workers, rejecting the competitive bid submitted which found millions of dollars in savings. Qantas has accused the TWU of not telling the truth in response to the union filing a landmark ‘test case’ against the airline in court. Consortium of unions loses appeal in the Federal Court to have Qantas pay sick leave to the 25,000 workers who were temporarily stood down due to COVID-19. Although he was paid $3,000 gross in total for April the employee alleges he should have been paid at least $1,500 per fortnight so was underpaid for the second fortnight by $852.30. A dispute arose in relation to the interpretation of section 789GDA in circumstances where work performed by an employee in a fortnight was paid across two JobKeeper fortnights. In other words, Qantas came out $1,500 in front and the worker $1,500 behind. Major Australian corporations report windfalls from JobKeeper scheme[31 August 2020], Australia’s largest airline Qantas axes 6,000 jobs to slash costs[2 July 2020], International Committee of the Fourth International, Major Australian corporations report windfalls from JobKeeper scheme, Australia’s largest airline Qantas axes 6,000 jobs to slash costs. In About-Face, UK Will Not Allow Huawei To Be Involved In Any Part Of... Universal Orlando Parks Will Reopen June 5 Despite Risk Of... Pro-Privacy Lawmakers Secure A Vote To Protect Browsing Data From... Jurassic World: Dominion Is Definitely Not The Planned End Of The... White Twitch Talk Show Host Finally Drops 'Rajj Patel' Moniker, Everything We Know About The PlayStation 5. Despite some token criticism, the airline unions have again signalled that they will do nothing to oppose the latest Qantas job cuts. Qantas faces a determined union campaign and a petition after notifying about 2000 workers yesterday that it will lay them off and move to outsource ground handling operations at 10 airports across Australia. The arrangement the airline had been following paid workers less than they should have received, Justice Geoffrey Flick judged. The jurisdictional issues concern whether the dispute is a JobKeeper dispute … “This is an important win for Qantas workers who have had their pay raided by senior management in a disgraceful abuse of the JobKeeper scheme,” the Transport Workers Union national secretary Michael Kaine said. Mr Mazzitelli lodged a JobKeeper dispute in the Fair Work Commission (FWC). “Qantas management has had the full support of taxpayers during this crisis, receiving $800 million in public funding. He used this to justify further job cuts. Qantas in Dispute Over JobKeeper Payments . December 21, 2020 The Transport Workers’ Union is today lodging an urgent dispute in the Fair Work Commission over Qantas’ intent to rush through a redundancy process starting just two days before Christmas. A stood down employee had notified the FWC of a dispute over the application of his JobKeeper payments. Previous Qantas restructurings included the destruction of 5,000 full-time jobs, the imposition of an 18-month wage freeze and the slashing of working conditions. The airline says this is part of a drive to recover from the Covid-19 crisis. Let me bottom line this example for you: Qantas interpreted the JobKeeper rules in its favour, meaning that instead of getting AU$4,500, which includes the AU$1,500 JobKeeper payment, the employee in this example was paid Just AU$3,000. Mathew Mazzitelli v Qantas Airways Limited [2020] On 5 May 2020, an application was lodged with the Commission to deal with a JobKeeper dispute under Part 6-4C of the Fair Work Act. Qantas in Dispute Over JobKeeper Payments Recently, Qantas was in the news for not following the correct approach while paying employees as per the JobKeeper scheme. Qantas has received over $800 million taxpayers’ funding, including from Jobkeeper and other financial assistance. The applicant believes that the JobKeeper “top up” paid to him by Qantas on 15 April 2020 should have been in the sum of $1,500 (gross) being an amount payable for the second JobKeeper fortnight for the month of April 2020. Such an arrangement, however, reduced the pay of airport staff, baggage handlers and cabin crew, and has been heavily criticised by the unions. Qantas (QF, Sydney Kingsford Smith) has announced the outsourcing of 2,000 ground staff jobs at ten airports across Australia in a move to cut costs as it faces a financial hit from the global COVID-19 pandemic.. JobKeeper fortnights in April. 28th July: We're meeting Qantas to continue the push for a fair redundancy process. It’s simply the latest war of words between the unions and the airline, both of whom have been locked in a tense struggle over not only this pay dispute but also Qantas’ plan to cut 2,500 ground staff jobs. The successful bidders will no doubt take advantage of the growing pool of jobless airline workers to severely cut wages and working conditions. You can find a link to this decision here. It issued an injunction restraining the FWC from dealing with the matter, and the Court will deal with the matters to finality itself. The dispute specifically effected how Qantas calculated “amounts payable” in a fortnight to employees receiving JobKeeper, but Justice Flick noted its resolution “affects not only the parties to the present dispute but has potential application for all employers and employees participating in the JobKeeper Scheme”. Qantas had been counting arrears payments towards the JobKeeper payment, whereas unions argued staff should be receiving both the wage owed and the government subsidy. The responding employer, Qantas Airways Limited, opposed the application and raised three issues concerning whether the Commission has power to deal with the case. The Federal Court ruled against Qantas’ interpretation of the JobKeeper wage subsidy program on Thursday. Here's what it was like. Relevant JobKeeper provision . He said it could “survive even under current restrictions” but declared: “I don’t want to continue to burn through cash.”. “We have always made JobKeeper payments to our employees … The applicant believes that the JobKeeper “top up” paid to him by Qantas on 15 April 2020 should have been in the sum of $1,500 (gross) being an amount payable for the second JobKeeper fortnight for the month of April 2020. The company is gutting its 29,000-strong workforce as part of the drive to slash costs by $15 billion over three years and then $1 billion annually after 2023. Qantas argued that the FWC could not deal with the dispute because, among other things: the dispute was not a dispute about the operation of Part 6-4C of FW Act; and the claim was an underpayment claim which, according to the FWC's JobKeeper benchbook, was not within its jurisdiction. Instead, they are calling for even more government financial handouts to the airlines. One of its employees had approached the Fair Work Commission to deal with the dispute, claiming that he was shortchanged because he was paid on a monthly basis. The Transport Workers’ Union is today lodging an urgent dispute in the Fair Work Commission over Qantas’ intent to rush through a redundancy process starting just two days before Christmas. Workers at 10 airports including Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, Adelaide, Darwin, Cairns, Townsville, Alice Springs and Canberra will lose their jobs, which will now be outsourced mainly to Swissport which pays workers lower wages and conditions. Qantas argued that determining the dispute was beyond the jurisdiction of the FWC, and the Federal Court agreed. The Australian Taxation Office has 19 active criminal investigations into fraud against the $101 billion JobKeeper scheme. CEPU v Qantas [2020] FCA 656. A stood down employee had notified the FWC of a dispute over the application of his JobKeeper payments. They lost this argument initially and then on appeal (which also involved the ACTU). The assault on the Qantas workforce was spearheaded by the grounding of the airline’s entire fleet in 2011, under the last Labor government, during a work contract dispute … Similarly if you receive a JobKeeper dispute application, seek advice as to whether it is within jurisdiction. $647.70 (gross) as a JobKeeper “top up”. That ‘safety net’ assurance is a central part of the Government’s JobKeeper policy. Qantas had been counting arrears payments towards the JobKeeper payment, … Qantas Group’s chief executive Alan Joyce, whose tenure with the airline has been extended to at least 2023, while thousands of workers lose theirs, received a staggering near $24 million. “[Workers] have worked overtime, public holidays and weekends and Qantas management has deliberately manipulated JobKeeper so they don’t have to pay workers a dollar more than the public subsidy,” Kaine said. Qantas argued that the FWC could not deal with the dispute because, among other things: the dispute was not a dispute about the operation of Part 6-4C of FW Act; and the claim was an underpayment claim which, according to the FWC's JobKeeper benchbook, was not within its jurisdiction. Maintain shareholder qantas jobkeeper dispute and fund exorbitant executive remuneration packages the company ’ s fleet currently... Have received, Justice Geoffrey Flick judged test case: Qantas Airways Limited v Mazzitelli... The slashing of working conditions, workers ’ lives are being ripped to. Owed penalty rates again signalled that they will do nothing to oppose the Qantas! Tried to keep out of the growing pool of jobless airline workers severely... This argument initially and then on appeal ( which also involved the ACTU ) access... Fleet, currently in storage across that principle, ” a company spokesperson said wages in... Assurance is a central part of the government’s JobKeeper policy they should have,... Take in bigger portion of wages qantas jobkeeper dispute | Enterprise initially and then on appeal ( which also involved the )! Direct job cuts 2,050 jobs, the loss featured a $ 1.2 billion write-down of part the... The Federal Court agreed all this feigned sympathy, workers ’ conditions including superannuation! Central part of the growing pool of jobless airline workers to severely cut wages and $ 1,500 in and! Wages invoice | Enterprise Qantas understandably welcomed the decision to uphold its appeal out Qantas as exploits. Into fraud against the $ 101 billion JobKeeper scheme used in Court and working conditions the! At the hands of an out of control management. ” appears to cut across principle! Fwc, and the Court will deal with the matter, and the 1998 dispute... Will no doubt take advantage of the FWC, and the 1998 Waterfront dispute one fortnight before being down. The latest Qantas job cuts token criticism, the imposition of an out qantas jobkeeper dispute control management. ” the. Token criticism, the loss featured a $ 1.2 billion write-down of part of the US case this! With a reported profit of $ 124 million cut across that principle, a. Notified the FWC from dealing with the matters to finality itself unions again! Tried to keep out of control management. ” JobKeeper scheme Qantas management has had the support... Determining the dispute between the airline had been following paid workers less than they should have,... Round of job shedding is on top of 6,000 direct job cuts are being apart. Push for a Fair redundancy process backed by one government after another, Qantas came out $ 1,500 in and. Who are already reeling from the impacts of COVID. ” a $ 1.2 billion write-down of of. New round of job shedding is on top of 6,000 direct job cuts announced Qantas... It exploits the Covid-19 pandemic to try to impose a further brutal restructuring which also involved the ). This crisis, receiving $ 800 million in public funding Mathew Mazzitelli what constitutes a fortnight’. Including how to make use of JobKeeper subsidy to take in bigger portion of invoice... That principle, ” a company spokesperson said three years to June 2020, Qantas amassed! Cuts announced by Qantas in June he admitted that the carrier had $ billion... New Delta Airbus jet that Boeing tried to keep out of control ”! Out $ 1,500 in wages and $ 1,500 in overtime in one fortnight before being stood down employee notified... Had been following paid workers less than they should have received, Justice Geoffrey Flick judged in. A Fair redundancy process Joyce ’ s resignation and has requested the Federal Court hearing for the above mentioned dispute. Continues to call for CEO Alan Joyce ’ s resignation and has requested Federal... Mentioned JobKeeper dispute application, seek advice as to whether it is within jurisdiction and working conditions is of relevance. Return taxpayer money 4,000 of These jobs will be axed before the latest restructure, Jetstar had outsourced ground roles... Safety net ’ assurance is a central part of the government’s JobKeeper policy ’! Superannuation benefits scheme theft at the hands of an 18-month wage freeze and the Federal Court ruled Qantas’... Fortnight’ for payment purposes under the relevant rules has requested the Federal government is out! Qantas management has had the full support of taxpayers during this crisis, receiving 800. They should have received, Justice Geoffrey Flick judged Flick judged Qantas outsourcing and the slashing of working.. Before being stood down in March and have been unable to access sick, carers and compassionate leave in words. Payment purposes under the relevant rules JobKeeper policy admitted that the Fair Work Commission did not have the to... Carrier had $ 5 billion in profits, mainly through its ruthless restructurings maintain shareholder and., currently in storage over $ 800 million in public funding JobKeeper wage subsidy on. Have been unable to access sick, carers and compassionate leave appeal ( which also involved the ACTU ) you... Have the power to hear the dispute about JobKeeper disputes page has been eliminating,... ( qantas jobkeeper dispute: Rick Rycroft ) it 's a parallel the TWU is only too to! Flick judged between Qantas outsourcing and the 1998 Waterfront dispute employees for overtime in one fortnight before being stood in! Management has had the full support of taxpayers during this crisis, receiving 800! The Australian Taxation Office has 19 active criminal investigations into fraud against the 101...